måndag 02 mars 2009 21:52:41 skrev Peter Krefting [off-list ref]:
Robin Rosenberg:
quoted
I'd be almost happy with a solution that works when people are interacting
using the subset that is convertible between the character sets in use.
You mean like the "invariant" character set? :-) Using Unicode internally
(in whatever encoding) is nice, the problem is when you have to interact
with the world around you.
Not sure what that is. I mean that in a local nordic, setting people can use iso-8859-1|15/windows-1252/UTF-8 for their needs be means of converting the characters as-needed without loss, with very few practial restrictions.
For a larger setting that won't do, but then the need is typically less since people tend to use ASCII only, or you jump to all unicode.
Just because I use UTF-8 doesn't mean I use start using more characters in practice.
-- robin