Re: [PATCH 04/13] remote: make get_remote_ref_states() always populate states.tracked

On Mon, Feb 23, 2009 at 10:09 PM, Jay Soffian [off-list ref] wrote:

No, but I wanted Jeff's changes. I have checked that I can apply the
"set HEAD" series, then Jeff's changes, then this latest series all to
next w/o conflict.

Put another way, IMO, the set HEAD series, Jeff's changes, and this
series might very well be a single topic.

quoted

In other words, you make your series unworkable with if you introduce too
many dependencies.

For future reference, should I build on top of master or next?

j.