Re: git merge --abort

2009/2/21 Jakub Narebski [off-list ref]:

On Sat, 21 Feb 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:

quoted

Jakub Narebski [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Perhaps this is the case fo "feature that waits for a user", namely
'git stash --no-reset', which would save a state just in case, perhaps
in a separate area and not refs/stash (ORIG_STASH perhaps?).

Isn't that Nana's "git stash --keep" patch posted a few weeks ago sitting
in "pu"?

Almost exactly.

When using it as a safety measure (perhaps enabled via configuration
variable, similarly to core.safecrlf or diff.autoRefreshIndex) we would
probably want to not save it in 'refs/stash' stack, but in single-use
ORIG_STATE (similar to HEAD reflog vs. ORIG_HEAD). And of course have
"git merge --abort" (or even "git pull --abort") as a porcelain.

It sounds like we have some sort of plan then.  Will Nana's patch be
committed into mainline git?  Then we can add the --abort porcelain