[PATCH/RFC v2 0/3] git checkout optimisation - part 3 · Kjetil Barvik <hidden> · 2016-06-15
[PATCH/RFC v2 1/3] fix compile error when USE_NSEC is defined · Kjetil Barvik <hidden> · 2016-06-15
[PATCH/RFC v2 2/3] make USE_NSEC work as expected · Kjetil Barvik <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 2/3] make USE_NSEC work as expected · Junio C Hamano <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 2/3] make USE_NSEC work as expected · Kjetil Barvik <hidden> · 2016-06-15
[PATCH/RFC v2 3/3] verify_uptodate(): add ce_uptodate(ce) test · Kjetil Barvik <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 0/3] git checkout optimisation - part 3 · Junio C Hamano <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 0/3] git checkout optimisation - part 3 · Kjetil Barvik <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 0/3] git checkout optimisation - part 3 · Sverre Rabbelier <hidden> · 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH/RFC v2 0/3] git checkout optimisation - part 3

From: Sverre Rabbelier <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:15

Heya,

On Fri, Feb 20, 2009 at 10:03, Kjetil Barvik [off-list ref] wrote:

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

Hmm, have you noticed that the rest of the stuff are queued on 'next'?

 Yes, I have!  I was also glad to receive my first acked-by git-tag!!

In that case, it wouldof been appopriate to base your further patches
on next rather than master ;).

-- 
Cheers,

Sverre Rabbelier