Re: [PATCH] Use DIFF_XDL_SET/DIFF_OPT_SET instead of raw bit-masking

Hi,

On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Keith Cascio wrote:

On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

But these improvements stand well on their own.

That was my point; without anything on top I would not like to risk 
regressions that easily.

quoted

... this does not look good to me, without a compelling reason why we 
want to have the patch nevertheless.

Is there something you dislike about the code style?  As always I'm 
happy to adjust it.

If you had not so conveniently clipped what I quoted just before the three 
dots, I could point out that it adds roughly double the number of lines 
as it removes.

Ciao,
Dscho