Re: [ANNOUNCE] tig-0.14

On 2009-02-16, Jonas Fonseca [off-list ref] wrote:

On Mon, Feb 16, 2009 at 02:33, Sitaram Chamarty [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

On 2009-02-15, Jonas Fonseca [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

patchset. One idea I would like to explore is to provide a compressed
version of the main view, where "intermediate" commits are hidden,
this way you could easily get a view of the relationship between
branches.

like 'gitk --simplify-by-decoration --all'?

Great, didn't know about this option. If only tig could show the

'git log' acquired it recently, or more precisely git
rev-list did, I think.

revision graph properly ... ;)

Yes I was going to ask about that, having been confused by
the graph once in a while.  You may want to consider using a
few other characters than the 4 you currently do (if indeed
that is the problem).

I'm interested in this too, and I do sometimes have complex
branch relationships in my work.  I'm no longer much of a C
programmer but I can certainly help test.