Finn Arne Gangstad [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
quoted
+cat >.gitignore <<EOF
You probably want to use \EOF here.
I am curious, does it matter? Most of the tests use EOF and not \EOF.
If you want the same shell variable expansion and quoting rules as you get
inside double-quote pair, you would say <<EOF without any quotes. If you
quote the EOF, no such substitutions happen.
In this particular case, you want what you typed there literally in the
file, so <<\EOF would be more correct, even though \# expands to \#
itself.
IOW, your current list of patterns does not happen to have anything like
$var nor \\ that would make a difference, but to protect future breakages
by people adding more patterns there, it is better to say <<\EOF when you
know you are not asking for any funny expansion to be explicit.