Thread (2 messages) flat view 2 messages, 2 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH] filter-branch: do not consider diverging submodules a 'dirty worktree'

From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:46:06

Johannes Schindelin [off-list ref] writes:
On Wed, 4 Feb 2009, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
Johannes Sixt [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Because if the repository is non-bare, then filter-branch updates the
work-tree at the end of the run; we don't want to overwrite uncommitted
work in this case.

This behavior is a relic from cg-admin-rewritehist, I think. I've never
found it useful.
Ok, I think "read-tree -m -u HEAD" at the end sort of makes sense, if you
filtered the branch you are currently sitting on.  Does that mean we do
not have to barf on dirtyness if we can tell if the filter-branch will not
touch the current branch at all?  Again, I am not suggesting it as an
improvement, but I am trying to see if I am talking a total nonsense.
That's correct.  Checking if we would touch the current branch is too 
expensive here, that's why we don't do it.
Ok, so these exchange suggests that the commit log message needs a bit
more explanation why the check matters before describing why submodules
should not be checked.  Something like this, perhaps?

    At the end of filter-branch in a non-bare repository, the work tree is
    updated with "read-tree -m -u HEAD", to carry the change forward in
    case the current branch was rewritten.  In order to avoid losing any
    local change during this step, filter-branch refuses to work when
    there are local changes in the work tree.

    This "read-tree -m -u HEAD" operation does not affect what commit is
    checked out in a submodule (iow, it does not touch .git/HEAD in a
    submodule checkout), and checking if there is any local change to the
    submodule is not useful.

While I think it makes sense to ignore submodules for the diff-files
check, I do not think it is correct to do so in the check to see if you
have staged changes.  If you updated what commit should be checked out in
your index, and if you run "read-tree -m -u HEAD", it can conflict the
same way as a staged change to a regular blob.  The most trivial example
would be if your filtering were to remove any submodule.  Your work tree
change wanted to modify while the branch switching is to remove and you
have a modify/remove conflict right there.  Or am I again confused?
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help