On Thu, Jan 29, 2009 at 01:20:20PM +0100, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
quoted
It wouldn't help the case of "somebody
else pushed some content that you want to pull", but like you said, I
think the primary workflow is that you immediately push after cloning
the empty repo.
Also, the only way to support the "somebody else pushed already"
workflow would be to assume the user wants to name the branch
'master', which might not be the case at all.
You could make a guess that they will use "master", and if you are
wrong, it behaves as now. But if you are right, "git pull" pulls down
master automatically.
But that is getting a little confusing. So let's push this "git push
--track" idea to completion and see how people like it.
-Peff