Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] git-am: emit usage when called w/o arguments and w/o patch on stdin

Jay Soffian [off-list ref] writes:

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 11:17 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

Jay Soffian [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

+     test $# = 0 && test -t 0 && usage

Sorry to be dense.  Why isn't your patch the above single liner?

"Also ensure that $dotest is cleaned up if user manages to interupt mailsplit
while it is processing input, but not if mailsplit exits non-zero due to
error."

My point was why "Also" needs to be in the same commit.  Aren't they
separate issues?