Re: [PATCH] mergetool merge/skip/abort

Charles Bailey [off-list ref] writes:

On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 05:58:35PM -0500, Theodore Tso wrote:
...
A quick blame session has shown that after Ted I've probably touched
the next most number of lines of mergetool. It's a crude measure and
not necessarily a sign of competence, I admit.

Although not rolling in spare time, I feel I'd be able review
mergetool patches at roughly the rate that they tend to appear at the
moment.

Given the above, if I pass the "good taste" and "Junio trust" tests I
feel that I should offer my services as mergetool patch wrangler.

Competence certainly counts to a certain extent, but volunteerism,
willingness, and enthusiasm count too.

Taste is sometimes a relative thing and we can make sure where we agree to
disagree on the list case by case basis.

Most importantly, anybody who will suffer when the tool breaks will be
much better person than I to look after it.  That is one of the largest
ingredient in the "trust" factor.

Thanks.