On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 07:43:20PM +0100, Sverre Rabbelier wrote:
On Sat, Jan 24, 2009 at 19:39, Chad Dombrova [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
what's the case against it, other than the obvious, that it will take more
work?
Good question, I think it was mostly that, someone has to implement it
(possibly as part of packv4). Backwards compatibility is of course
always an concern, but I'm not too familiar with the subject, perhaps
other people on the list (or even those were at the gittogether) can
comment?
If I understand his proposal correctly, such objects must _not_ be part
of a pack. The whole idea is splitting them _more_, not less.
-Peff