Re: [BUG] assertion failure in builtin-mv.c with "git mv -k"

Michael J Gruber [off-list ref] writes:

I'm happy to follow any variant ("1+2+3", "1 2+3", "1 2 3", in
increasing order of preference) so there's no need to discuss or explain
this further, just tell me "do x" ;)

Do nothing ;-) Your 1=3772923 and 2+3=be17262d are already in and we can
include the fix in the next 1.6.1.X maintenance release.

Thanks.