Johannes Sixt [off-list ref] writes:
When a merge that has a conflict was rebased, then rebase stopped to let
the user resolve the conflicts. However, thereafter --continue failed
because the author-script was not saved. (This is rebase -i's way to
preserve a commit's authorship.) This fixes it by doing taking the same
failure route after a merge that is also taken after a normal cherry-pick.
Signed-off-by: Johannes Sixt <redacted>
---
This is an attempt at fixing the failure. I don't know whether it is
problematic to leave a "patch" behind if there was actually a merge.
Nevertheless, all rebase tests pass.
Interesting approach. Dscho?