Re: [RFC] cgit in git?
From: Johan Herland <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:45
On Thursday 11 December 2008, Lars Hjemli wrote:
Background: I've been asked by the fedora project how to package cgit. The problem is basically that cgit is designed to be statically linked with a specific git release (i.e. libgit.a and xdiff/lib.a). When manually building cgit from a tarball this isn't a problem: 'make get-git' will download the required git sources from kernel.org. But the buildsystem/policy used by the fedora project does not allow network access during package builds, and since it is quite unlikely that the git package always will match the exact release needed by the cgit package, I only see four options: 1) the fedora project makes a 'git-for-cgit' package containing the needed release of the git sources 2) the cgit release tarballs includes the needed git sources 3) the cgit sources are subtree-merged into git 4) cgit is modified to link against libgit2 Option 1 seems unlikely to happen since such a 'git-for-cgit' package would basically require the fedora project to support two git packages. Option 2 is doable but still requires the fedora project to support two git packages (but now the 'git-for-cgit' package is hidden inside the cgit source tree). The good thing about this option is that it only requires some minor modifications to the cgit releases. Option 3 would solve the problem for the fedora project but is not for me to decide - it might become an extra maintenance burden on the git maintainer and community. Option 4 is the correct solution but not a very practical one; it's currently hard to predict when libgit2 will be ready for general (c)git use. Personally I'd love for option 3 to happen, hence this rfc.
Option 5: Include cgit as a submodule in git.git. Then it's available to those who want it, but not cloned/built by default. If that doesn't pan out, I also support option #3. I've been a happy cgit user for a number of months, and have yet to find a single issue where cgit is not better than or equal to gitweb. I have nothing bad to say about gitweb per se, but cgit simply offers me a better user experience, not least because of its blazing speed. Have fun! ...Johan -- Johan Herland, [off-list ref] www.herland.net