Re: commit type

Hi,

On Fri, 31 Oct 2008, 7rans wrote:

David Symonds <dsymonds <at> gmail.com> writes:

quoted

On Fri, Oct 31, 2008 at 10:58 AM, 7rans <transfire <at> gmail.com> 
wrote:

quoted

Currently I achieve this by adding "[type]" to the end of my commit 
messages. But of course that's less than optimal.

Why is that less than optimal? It seems a lot less intrusive than what 
you suggest.

Because it becomes formalized. Which means people can write tools other 
people can use to work with them.

So you want to force this onto all Git users?

If yes: that murmur you hear in the background, it might well be the 
collective "thanks, but no thanks" of people who do not want that type of 
distinction between different commits.

If no: what would be the real difference from that suffix in the oneline?

Ciao,
Dscho