Re: [PATCH] Documentation: add a planning document for the next CLI revamp
From: Theodore Tso <tytso@mit.edu>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:33
On Wed, Oct 29, 2008 at 08:48:05PM -0700, Sam Vilain wrote:
From: Sam Vilain <redacted> For cross-command CLI changes to be effective, they need to be cohesively planned. Add a planning document for this next set of changes.
Here are my favorites:
* Add the command "git revert-file <files>" which is syntactic sugar for:
git checkout HEAD -- <files>
Rationale: Many other SCM's have a way of undoing local edits to a
file very simply, i.e."hg revert <file>" or "svn revert <file>", and
for many developers's workflow, it's useful to be able to undo local
edits to a single file, but not to everything else in the working
directory. And "git checkout HEAD -- <file>" is rather cumbersome
to type, and many beginning users don't find it intuitive to look in
the "git-checkout" man page for instructions on how to revert a
local file.
* Change the argument handling for "git format-patch" so it is
consistent with everything else which takes a set of commits. Yes,
it means that where people have gotten used to typing "git
format-patch origin", they'll have to type instead: "git
format-patch origin..", but's much more consistent. We've done the
best we can by documenting the existing behavior, but if'we re going
to make major, potentially incompatible, CLI changes, this is
something to at least consider. Maybe with a config file for people
who really don't want to retrain their fingers to type the two extra
periods?
- Ted