Re: [PATCH] rebase-i-p: only list commits that require rewriting in todo

Stephen Haberman [off-list ref] writes:

Looks good--I applied this locally and it passes t3404, t3410, and
t3411. Do I need to do anything else with this, e.g. resubmit/append on
top of the previous series, or do you have it taken care of?

I've queued it on top of your series and merged the result in 'next'.
Further improvements should be done the same way.

I will be bullish about the use cases I'd like to see work (these
preserve merges tweaks and the config setting for `git pull`), but
humble about my patches. This one especially is not elegant, it just
passes the tests.

That's perfectly fine.  We can start from sound ideas (the behaviour we would want
to see) and incrementally improve the implementation.

Thanks.