On Sat, Oct 18, 2008 at 03:50, Shawn O. Pearce [off-list ref] wrote:
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Shawn, was there any issue with this one? The patch changes the function
signature for no good reason (at least, it does not have anything to do
with the stated purpose of the change), but other than that, I think what
it attempts to do makes sense.
No, aside from the signature issue I think its reasonable.
Ok, I will post a new single patch, that does only this.
Bert
--
Shawn.