Daniel Barkalow [off-list ref] writes:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2008, Junio C Hamano wrote:
quoted
The patch to branch.c is a quick fix for this issue. The resulting code
passes all the tests, but I am not very proud of hardcoding the "HEAD" in
the code. There must be a better way to do this.
I agree with the change to the test. I think it would be better to
hard-code "refs/heads/" instead of "HEAD", and I feel like we must have a
"is this ref name a branch?" function, if only because someone could stick
"refs/tags/foo" in HEAD, and we should still say it's not something you
could track, despite it being something different from "HEAD".
But you can track things under refs/remotes/, so...