Re: Fwd: git status options feature suggestion

Hi,

On Thu, 9 Oct 2008, Caleb Cushing wrote:

quoted

How about "git ls-files -o"?

doh... hadn't even heard of that command.

Which is good!  As ls-files is listed as plumbing.  Users should not need 
to call ls-files, so I like your idea about adding --new, --untracked etc. 
to "git status" (I do not agree with others that "git status" has to stay 
that non-existant "git commit --dry-run").

Could you list exactly which options you want implemented?

Ciao,
Dscho