Thread (13 messages) flat view 13 messages, 5 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: [PATCH 1/3] Prepare for non-interactive merge-preserving rebase

From: Andreas Ericsson <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:25

Stephen Haberman wrote:
quoted
Stephen, I had to modify the tests a bit to get them to work with how
I implemented the merge-preserving rebase, and also to remove a lot of
the cruft that was previously in there. Hope you're ok with the
attribution in the commit message.
No problem, it looks great.

This is awesome. Thanks for the insanely short turnaround. The
GIT_EDITOR=: hack is neat. I did not think it would be that simple.
Stephen, are you using this in production? How's it turning out?

Shawn, I haven't seen this in any of your branches. Overlooked or
dropped? I think 1-2 are probably master material, while I'm not
so sure about 3/3. Would you prefer a re-send that turns it into
a 2-patch series, adding each test with the functionality it tests?

Let me know how you want it and I'll work something up tomorrow
morning, gmt + 1.

Thanks

-- 
Andreas Ericsson                   andreas.ericsson@op5.se
OP5 AB                             www.op5.se
Tel: +46 8-230225                  Fax: +46 8-230231
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help