Re: Gitk and --no-walk don't play together

Jan Engelhardt [off-list ref] writes:

On Monday 2008-09-08 12:34, Santi Bejar wrote:

quoted

quoted

in an attempt to only show only the tags in the graph, gitk barfs:

Use the "List references" in the file menu.

Nope, the intention was to have gitk display something like

* Linux 2.6.26
|
* Linux 2.6.25

without any intermediate commits.

Aren't you being unreasonable?  How would gitk know to draw the line
between .25 and .26 without walking the history?