Re: Are more and more patches getting lost lately?

"Imran M Yousuf" [off-list ref] writes:

I actually liked the following 2 patch and since it was Junio I did
not think support was required :-D.
...

quoted

From: Junio C Hamano <redacted>
Subject: [PATCH/RFC] feeding Maildir to git-am
Date: Tue, 19 Aug 2008 22:25:57 -0700
Message-ID: [ref]

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/92963

From: Junio C Hamano <redacted>
Subject: Re* [PATCH] git-apply - Add --include=PATH
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2008 01:05:31 -0700
Message-ID: [ref]

http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/93604

I think for most of these patches, and other patches from me of the same
nature, I tried to make it clear that the patches were primarily to
illustrate possibly better solutions, and I do not consider them finished
solutions.

The quality of these patches from me do not meet my patch acceptance
criteria.

More importantly I wasn't the one with the itch.  Onus of testing them,
polishing them as necessary and providing documentation into the final
applicable patch lie on the original requestors' shoulders.

Especially when I am busy.