Thread (10 messages) flat view 10 messages, 5 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: pack count on repo.or.cz [was "Medium term dreams"]

From: Petr Baudis <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:16

On Tue, Sep 02, 2008 at 07:54:24AM -0400, Jeff King wrote:
So did you check for loose objects? That is what you should get if there
were any objects that would have been lost. If there aren't any new
loose objects, then there were no objects that would be lost.
Before:

rover:/srv/git/git.git# l objects~/??/* | wc -l
3343
rover:/srv/git/git.git# l objects~/pack/* | wc -l
750

After:

rover:/srv/git/git.git# l objects/??/* | wc -l
2920
rover:/srv/git/git.git# l objects/pack/* | wc -l
590
As to why the other packs weren't pruned, I don't know. In my example,
you can see that the pruning happens as we expect. So either there is a
bug in git-prune-packed, or there is something we're not realizing.
Well, that's my question here. :-)

If you're still interested in looking into this further, you can wget -r
or rsync over the git.git repository from repo.or.cz.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
The next generation of interesting software will be done
on the Macintosh, not the IBM PC.  -- Bill Gates
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help