Re: [PATCH] git-commit: '--no-status' Allow suppression of status summary in commit msg
From: Alex Riesen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:15
Junio C Hamano, Thu, Aug 28, 2008 21:09:35 +0200:
Marcus Griep [off-list ref] writes:quoted
Currently, using any editor to edit a commit message for 'git commit' kicks of a 'git status' which is then included as comments to give the commit author some context. However, in some situations, such as having a working tree of many hundred thousand files or on an inefficient filesystem,I am not interested in this particular patch, especially the part that hoards a short-and-nice -S flag that we could use for something more useful. Also calling the configuration variable "nostatus" is backwards; I'd name it to "showstatus" that defaults to "true" if I were doing this.
I like it (almost. I agree, it is not a very good idea to use up "-S" for such a thing). Not because of "inefficient filesystem" (I have proper systems at home), but because I more often need no file list in the commit message than I do need one. It is just annoyance. OTOH, maybe I'm just too used to put things in the index and trust that. Or maybe it is again that stupid user-friendliness.
If that is not still enough for your particular use case, I think you can
have a custom wrapper that does:
#!/bin/sh
: >.log-message-file &&
vi .log-message-file &&
git commit -F .log-message-file "$@" &&
rm -f .log-message-file
without touching git at all.That's not enough. Consider "-mMessage -e", "-t" or "-c" flags of git commit. The wrapper would have to catch them all! Not to mention the future flags in the same ballpark. ATM, I just use that "--cached" (from the patch I mentioned in the other mail) with "--cleanup=verbatim" to get the commit message just how I like them.