Re: [PATCH 3/3] git-add --intent-to-add (-N)
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:12
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-06-15 · [PATCH 3/3] git-add --intent-to-add (-N) · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH 3/3] git-add --intent-to-add (-N) · Paolo Bonzini <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH 3/3] git-add --intent-to-add (-N) · Jonathan Nieder <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH 3/3] git-add --intent-to-add (-N) · Jonathan Nieder <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH 3/3] git-add --intent-to-add (-N) · Daniel Barkalow <hidden>
Jonathan Nieder [off-list ref] writes:
Wait, is [1/3] meant to create that strong of an illusion? That is, should has_sha1_file pretend the object is present, too?
AFAIR has_sha1_file() is actually used to write out the object for real after you have been pretending it exists, so no. Didn't I already tell you that you seem to have picked only one out of _three_ patch series?