Re: Suggestion: "man git clone"

Peter Valdemar Mørch (Lists) wrote:

Sorry man that behaviour is the way "man" works. See "man man".

  $ git clone --help
or
  $ git help clone

work right?

Peter

P.S: man, there are puns in that...

I know that that is the way "man" currently works.

I doubt you find *anyone* who relies on the current behaviour, so I am 
suggesting changing man.  That's why the man author was on the recipient 
list, but you removed it.

	-hpa