Alex Riesen <raa.lkml <at> gmail.com> writes:
Jeff King, Tue, Aug 19, 2008 19:07:31 +0200:
quoted
On Tue, Aug 19, 2008 at 05:50:14PM +0200, Lea Wiemann wrote:
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ static void handle_from(const struct strbuf *from)
el = strcspn(at, " \n\t\r\v\f>");
strbuf_reset(&email);
strbuf_add(&email, at, el);
- strbuf_remove(&f, at - f.buf, el + 1);
+ strbuf_remove(&f, at - f.buf, el + (at[el] ? 1 : 0));
+ strbuf_remove(&f, at - f.buf, el + !!at[el]);
(Some people'll kill me for that :)
And why shouldn't they when:
strbuf_remove(&f, at - f.buf, el + (at[el] != 0));
is infinitely better in every possible way? ;)