Re: [PATCH] add a 'pre-push' hook
From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:11
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH] add a 'pre-push' hook · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH] add a 'pre-push' hook · Scott Chacon <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH] add a 'pre-push' hook · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH] add a 'pre-push' hook · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [PATCH] add a 'pre-push' hook · Shawn O. Pearce <hidden>
On Wed, Aug 20, 2008 at 10:26:48AM +1200, Sam Vilain wrote:
quoted
I think the common wisdom has been that such tests should be done on the _receiving_ end, since that makes a more trustworthy enforcement point.Probably true, but if someone wants to arrange it the other way around, what harm is there in that?
Read the rest of the message you are quoting where I say basically that. -Peff