More on git over HTTP POST · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2016-06-15
Re: More on git over HTTP POST · Shawn O. Pearce <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: More on git over HTTP POST · Daniel Stenberg <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: More on git over HTTP POST · Shawn O. Pearce <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: More on git over HTTP POST · Petr Baudis <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: More on git over HTTP POST · Shawn O. Pearce <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: More on git over HTTP POST · Shawn O. Pearce <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: More on git over HTTP POST · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2016-06-15
Re: More on git over HTTP POST · Shawn O. Pearce <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: More on git over HTTP POST · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2016-06-15
Re: More on git over HTTP POST · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2016-06-15
Re: More on git over HTTP POST · Mike Hommey <hidden> · 2016-06-15
[RFC 1/2] Add backdoor options to receive-pack for use in Git-aware CGI · Shawn O. Pearce <hidden> · 2016-06-15
[RFC 2/2] Add Git-aware CGI for Git-aware smart HTTP transport · Shawn O. Pearce <hidden> · 2016-06-15
Re: [RFC 2/2] Add Git-aware CGI for Git-aware smart HTTP transport · "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> · 2016-06-15
Re: [RFC 2/2] Add Git-aware CGI for Git-aware smart HTTP transport · Shawn O. Pearce <hidden> · 2016-06-15

Re: More on git over HTTP POST

From: Petr Baudis <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:06

On Sat, Aug 02, 2008 at 02:08:28PM -0700, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:

I know one very big company who cannot use or support Git because
Git over HTTP is too slow to be useful.  They support other tools
like Subversion instead.  :-|

On what projects? I'm currently using Git over HTTP (read-only) a lot
and it doesn't seem really all that impractical to me. Maybe just using
a more dumb-friendly packing scheme could help a lot?

				Petr "Pasky" Baudis

`h`	back out one level
`j`	next message in thread
`k`	previous message in thread
`l`	drill in
`Esc`	close help / fold thread tree
`?`	toggle this help