Re: GIT 1.6.0-rc1
From: Alex Riesen <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:04
Junio C Hamano, Wed, Jul 30, 2008 00:03:44 +0200:
Alex Riesen [off-list ref] writes:quoted
quoted
Alex, I ran the full test with this, but only on Linux boxes; obviously not on any flavor of Windows. I think it is correct, and the "first line of defence" fix is the same as your patch, so I'd assume it would work for you as well. But extra eyeballs are always appreciated.Well, it works on Cygwin too. And I had my eyeballs on the code (wondered first if it will cause more fs accesses than before: it will, in the racy check. Which is correct, AFAICT)I thought racy check won't even trigger for gitlinks, no?
I didn't know. But now, come to think of it, there wouldn't be much point - the gitlinks are always compared by content, aren't they?
ce_modified_check_fs() has 3 call sites: - the call site in ie_match_stat() is protected with is_racy_timestamp() that is always false for gitlinks; - the call site in ie_modified() we just took care of in the current thread; - the other call site is in ce_smudge_racily_clean_entry(), which is called from write_index() but it also is protected with is_racy_timestamp() that is always false for gitlinks.
So, the change in ce_modified_check_fs is not really needed, because the gitlink case is never executed?