Re: git-scm.com

  Hi,

On Sat, Jul 26, 2008 at 04:25:16AM +0200, Johannes Schindelin wrote:

On Fri, 25 Jul 2008, Scott Chacon wrote:

quoted

A followup on the post I did a few days ago about Git documentation.
I forked Petr's git.or.cz site and put up a version that I think is a
bit more accessible and newbie-friendly at git-scm.com.

I do not like the implication that Git eats trees.

  yes, I keep wondering about the logo as well. On one side it is rather
amusing, on the other side... somehow it didn't win my heart over and it
*does* look somewhat unprofessional.

I also do not like that the link to "Documentation" looks more like a 
too-short cheat-sheet.

  I personally don't find the idea of having direct links to the most
used commands bad, though I'm not sure how useful will it be in
practice.

But then, I think that git.or.cz looks more professional (read: more 
respectful, less geekish), so I think there is not much harm in that.

  Note that I tried to fix up a lot of bits that I felt were a little
too colloquial in my patch series I linked in a previous mail.

-- 
				Petr "Pasky" Baudis
As in certain cults it is possible to kill a process if you know
its true name.  -- Ken Thompson and Dennis M. Ritchie