Re: git rebase to move a batch of patches onto the current branch
From: Daniel Barkalow <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:02
On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Avery Pennarun wrote:
On 7/24/08, Alex Riesen [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
Avery Pennarun, Thu, Jul 24, 2008 22:16:06 +0200:quoted
On 7/24/08, Alex Riesen [off-list ref] wrote:quoted
quoted
gcp3 ()> > { > > git format-patch -k --stdout --full-index "$@" | git am -k -3 --binary > > } > > But that'll give up when there are conflicts, right? git-rebase lets > me fix them in a nice way. No, it same as in rebase. You'll fix them and do "git am --resolved". See manpage of git am.Hmm, cool. So that command isn't too easy to come upon by accident. If I wanted to submit a patch to make this process a bit more obvious, would it make sense to simply have git-cherry-pick call that sequence when you give it more than one commit?
Before terribly long, we'll have "git sequencer", which should be easy to get to do the "rebase -i" thing with cherry-pick-style usage (somebody would just need to write code to generate the correct series of pick statements). -Daniel *This .sig left intentionally blank*