Thread (9 messages) flat view 9 messages, 5 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: git rebase to move a batch of patches onto the current branch

From: Daniel Barkalow <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:02

On Thu, 24 Jul 2008, Avery Pennarun wrote:
On 7/24/08, Alex Riesen [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
Avery Pennarun, Thu, Jul 24, 2008 22:16:06 +0200:
quoted
On 7/24/08, Alex Riesen [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
    gcp3 ()
 > >     {
 > >         git format-patch -k --stdout --full-index "$@" | git am -k -3 --binary
 > >     }
 >
 > But that'll give up when there are conflicts, right?  git-rebase lets
 > me fix them in a nice way.

No, it same as in rebase. You'll fix them and do "git am --resolved".
 See manpage of git am.
Hmm, cool.

So that command isn't too easy to come upon by accident.  If I wanted
to submit a patch to make this process a bit more obvious, would it
make sense to simply have git-cherry-pick call that sequence when you
give it more than one commit?
Before terribly long, we'll have "git sequencer", which should be easy to 
get to do the "rebase -i" thing with cherry-pick-style usage (somebody 
would just need to write code to generate the correct series of pick 
statements).

	-Daniel
*This .sig left intentionally blank*
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help