Re: [RFC] Git User's Survey 2008
From: Jakub Narebski <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:00
Dnia środa 23. lipca 2008 17:14, Jean-François Veillette napisał:
Le 08-07-22 à 21:25, Jakub Narebski a écrit :quoted
First there is a question about the form of survey. Should we use web based survey, as the survey before (http://www.survey.net.nz), sending emails with link to this survey, or perhaps do email based survey, with email Reply-To: address put for this survey alone? Should we use the same web survey service as before (found by Paolo Ciarrocchi for first, 2006 survey, and used also for 2007 survey), or is there one better (it would better be free, and without limitations on the number of responses; in 2006 there were around 117 responses, in 2007 there were 683 individual responses).Consider http://www.survs.com It is still in beta but already years ahead of the proposed solution. I don't know about the specific of the beta (cost, availability, etc.) but I had a live presentation of the product and it is an amazingly great product !
It certainly _looks_ nice, but it lacks one very important feature (or at least I was not able to find it): the ability to download *RAW* data to analyse it off-line using more advanced tools (like for example Perl script to clean-up responses; spreadsheet like Excel or Gnumeric, or some statictics tool like R to analyze data, for example do a correlation between responses to different questions). http://www.survey.net.nz allows to download raw data in modified CSV format (modified as it allows for line continuation). See for example raw data for Git User's Survey 2007 results: http://git.or.cz/gitwiki/GitSurvey2007?action=AttachFile&do=get&target=surveydata.csv There is another nice thing that http://www.survey.net.nz is supposed to have (but it doesn't unfortunately work; at least downloading current layout of survey to tweak off-line doesn't/didn't work), namely ability to create survey off-line using some specified text format, and upload it, instead of creating it on-line (which might be much work for large surveys). -- Jakub Narebski Poland