Re: q: faster way to integrate/merge lots of topic branches?

* Ingo Molnar [off-list ref] wrote:

Even assuming that the filesystem is sane, is my merge-cache 
implementation semantically equivalent to a git-merge? One detail is 
that i suspect it is not equivalent in the git-merge --no-ff case. 
(but that is a not too interesting non-default case anyway)

actually, since --no-ff creates a merge commit and thus propagates the 
head sha1, this should work fine as well.

(besides the small detail that my script has $1 hardcoded so parameters 
are not properly passed onto.)

	Ingo