Re: [PATCH] rebase -i: only automatically amend commit if HEAD did not change
From: Dmitry Potapov <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:45:00
On Tue, Jul 22, 2008 at 06:22:34PM -0400, Avery Pennarun wrote:
This patch is perhaps a symptom of something I've been meaning to ask about for a while. Why doesn't "edit" just stage the commit and not auto-commit it at all? That way an amend would *never* be necessary, and rebase --continue would always do a commit -a (if there was anything left to commit).
Actually, it would be better to refuse to continue if there are unstaged changes in the work tree, and if all changes are staged then just do git commit.
The special case fixed by this patch would thus not be needed. It would also make it more obvious how to remove files from a commit, for example, without having to learn about "git reset". For that matter, you wouldn't have to learn about "git commit --amend" either, and it would save typing.
It would not only save typing, but also help to avoid costly mistakes where users, being taught to use "git commit --amend" after editing during git-rebase, fire this command automatically after a conflict resolution and get two commits accidently squashed. So, I completely agree that the current auto-commit behavior is not very user friendly... Dmitry