"Sverre Rabbelier" [off-list ref] writes:
On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 1:16 AM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
quoted
On Sun, Jul 20, 2008 at 11:05 PM, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
I could make "What's cooking" not a follow-up to the previous issue, or
perhaps add "(volume 1.6.0, issue 28)" at the end of the Subject.
The downside of this is that it'll be less easy to see the difference
with the previous version.
My vague recollection is that it was Pasky who complained long time ago
when "What's in" was not a follow-up to its previous round, which led me
to switch my workflow to send them in the current form. You cannot
satisfy certain people no matter what you do.
Add an interdiff at the bottom of the mail? You can't satisfy
everybody no matter what you do, but you can come quite far, it
usually means you have to do a lot of work to do so though.
Do you think I have an infinite bandwidth? I don't.