Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics)

Petr Baudis [off-list ref] writes:

Do you think this would create serious problems?

One thing this patch series depends on now is changing the git mv
semantics in a rather non-trivial way, which is something we might want
to do in a major release instead of within the 1.6 series.

The change to git-mv perhaps is necessary to happen between a major
release boundary.  I do not know if the current round of patch to do so
will become ready in time for 1.6.0.  The rename-ce-at patch I looked at
did not look like it was.