Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics)
From: Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:56
Lea Wiemann [off-list ref] writes:
Lea Wiemann wrote:quoted
It'll be fixed in the next version I postBy the way Junio, how do you prefer to get reposts of patch sequences? Should I repost the whole sequence under a new common parent message, or can I simply post v2 of each patch in the sequence as a followup to its respective v1?
I do not have major preference either way, but for a long series, I'd
prefer a resend to be independent from the previous series, i.e.
[PATCH 0/3]
.[PATCH 1/3]
..[PATCH 2/3]
...[PATCH 3/3]
[PATCH 0/4 v2]
.[PATCH 1/4 v2]
..[PATCH 2/4 v2]
...[PATCH 3/4 v2]
....[PATCH 4/4 v2]
I can live with the first one from the new series being a follow-up to the
first one from the old series, i.e.:
[PATCH 0/3]
.[PATCH 1/3]
..[PATCH 2/3]
...[PATCH 3/3]
.[PATCH 0/4 v2]
..[PATCH 1/4 v2]
...[PATCH 2/4 v2]
....[PATCH 3/4 v2]
.....[PATCH 4/4 v2]
but _not_ with this, i.e. N/M being followup to old N/M:
[PATCH 0/3]
.[PATCH 0/4 v2]
.[PATCH 1/3]
..[PATCH 1/4 v2]
..[PATCH 2/3]
...[PATCH 2/4 v2]
...[PATCH 3/3]
....[PATCH 3/4 v2]
.....[PATCH 4/4 v2]