From: Shawn O. Pearce <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:54
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
SZEDER Gábor [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
Hope that I got the commit message right (;
It was very readable. Thanks.
Acked-by: Shawn O. Pearce <redacted>
quoted
+__git_has_doubledash ()
+{
+ local c=1
+ while [ $c -lt $COMP_CWORD ]; do
+ if [ "--" = "${COMP_WORDS[c]}" ]; then
+ return 0
+ fi
+ c=$((++c))
This assignment is somewhat curious, although it should work as expected
either way ;-)
I agree, its damned odd. But we already do this in the same
sort of loop inside of _git_branch() (see around line 541 in
next). This new patch is only sticking with our current set
of conventions in the script, so I say its fine.
--
Shawn.
From: SZEDER Gábor <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:54
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 11:18:37PM +0000, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
SZEDER Gábor [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
+ c=$((++c))
This assignment is somewhat curious, although it should work as expected
either way ;-)
I agree, its damned odd. But we already do this in the same
sort of loop inside of _git_branch() (see around line 541 in
next). This new patch is only sticking with our current set
of conventions in the script, so I say its fine.
Well, according to
git blame contrib/completion/git-completion.bash |grep '++'
you started this convention back in 2006, I just copied and modified
your code (;
Maybe an old C++ "heritage"? In C++ it matters for class types (e.g.
iterators), because the postfix operator might be slower than the
prefix.
Best,
Gábor
From: Shawn O. Pearce <hidden> Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:54
SZEDER GGGbor [off-list ref] wrote:
On Tue, Jul 08, 2008 at 11:18:37PM +0000, Shawn O. Pearce wrote:
quoted
Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
quoted
SZEDER Gábor [off-list ref] writes:
quoted
+ c=$((++c))
This assignment is somewhat curious, although it should work as expected
either way ;-)
Well, according to
git blame contrib/completion/git-completion.bash |grep '++'
you started this convention back in 2006, I just copied and modified
your code (;
Yea, I don't doubt it was me that did this.
Maybe an old C++ "heritage"? In C++ it matters for class types (e.g.
iterators), because the postfix operator might be slower than the
prefix.
Unlikely, but maybe. I'm not really a C++ programmer. I tend to
avoid C++ when/if I am given the chance to do so.
--
Shawn.