On Mon, Jul 07, 2008 at 11:03:46AM -0400, Brian Gernhardt wrote:
I personally expected @{1} to be identical to HEAD@{1}. Since omitting a
ref usually refers to HEAD, why shouldn't omitting it when referring to
the reflogs mean the HEAD log? The definition of @{1} is useful since
there's no other easy way to get "current branch's reflog", but I think
it's non-obvious. (Since HEAD@{1} is something completely different, I
think the only other way to refer to @{1} is $(git symbolic-ref)@{1}.)
FYI, there was much discussion about this exact point:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/38379
(I don't know that it has that much bearing on the current discussion,
but since I went to the trouble of digging it up, I thought you might
find it useful).
-Peff