Re: [GSoC] What is status of Git's Google Summer of Code 2008 projects?
From: Stephan Beyer <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:54
Hi, Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:
Stephan Beyer [off-list ref] writes:quoted
(Well, I think the http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/86985 thread died in the last days, but I hope some responses will come and also that Junio's patch for cherry-picking root commits will be included. I try to be patient...) ;-)Please don't be patient but actively re-review what you sent out. I _really_ wanted to merge the basic bits and rewrite of "am" at least to pu tonight, but I had to drop them after noticing that it does not seem to handle --rebasing at all (it parses to set $rebasing but after that where does that bit go?
Yes, you are right that am --rebasing is a no-op. That option was a little mystery to me, because it seemed to do nothing special, but I'll check again (bash-completion etc) and do appropriate changes.
About the "rewrite rebase to use sequencer" bits, because we've dropped the older rebase-i change, I do not want your series to depend on it.
Yes, I made the mistake that I started developing on "next" and I did not expect that js/rebase-i-sequencer could be dropped. (I somehow expected the opposite, that it would be migrated to master some day.) Then I wanted to make it work on master, and thought this is simply done by removing the "additional features" (-f and -p option using extended todo list), but then I noticed that master also has a -p which works entirely different and I wanted to see that stuff on the list before July 1st and I had no idea what the status of js/rebase-i-sequencer is. So I just tried and sent that last patch to the list in that way. But now I have a clear statement. So I'm going to send a new patchset (also with an EXAMPLES section in the docs) to the list in a few days. Big thanks for the feedback, Stephan -- Stephan Beyer [off-list ref], PGP 0x6EDDD207FCC5040F