Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/4] Add git-sequencer shell prototype
From: Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:53
Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/4] Add git-sequencer shell prototype · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/4] Add git-sequencer shell prototype · Johannes Schindelin <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/4] Add git-sequencer shell prototype · Jakub Narebski <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/4] Add git-sequencer shell prototype · Stephan Beyer <hidden>
- 2016-06-15 · Re: [RFC/PATCH 1/4] Add git-sequencer shell prototype · Junio C Hamano <hidden>
Hi, On Fri, 4 Jul 2008, Stephan Beyer wrote:
Johannes Schindelin wrote:quoted
and you can easily abort a rebase if you explicitely asked for an invalid strategy.Aborting after fixing a lot of conflicts in the sequencer process is really annoying.
I think it should use rerere (if activated, which I have given up advocating to be the default).
So I've chosen to never abort automatically.
Who said anything about automatically? Of _course_, the user has to abort it. Or try to continue with "git sequencer --continue -s ours". Ciao, Dscho