Thread (72 messages) flat view 72 messages, 20 authors, 2016-06-15

Re: What's cooking in git.git (topics)

From: Jeff King <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:51

Possibly related (same subject, not in this thread)

On Sun, Jun 29, 2008 at 01:55:13AM -0700, Junio C Hamano wrote:
* jk/maint-fetch-ref-hier (Thu Jun 26 23:59:50 2008 -0400) 1 commit
 + fetch: report local storage errors in status table

When the remote used to have "foo" branch but now has "foo/bar", fetch
refuses to delete the existing remote tracking branch "foo" to create a
new remote tracking branch "foo/bar", but the error message was
confusing.
Where do we want to take this? The conversation went something like:

   me: here's a patch where we hint about "remote prune"
  you: why not just fix the refs, it's no worse than a rewind
   me: we kill reflogs, so it is different than a rewind
  you: oh, right

So I'm not sure if that was "Oh, right, it's not a good idea to remove
the conflicting ref" or "Oh, right, but it's probably still fine."

-Peff
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help