Re: An alternate model for preparing partial commits

On Fri, Jun 27, 2008 at 10:54 AM, Johannes Schindelin
[off-list ref] wrote:

Hi,

On Fri, 27 Jun 2008, Robert Anderson wrote:

quoted

Here's a patch to match the local culture:  "It is incredible how stupid
the idea of the index is."

Clearly you should now be interested.

No, you're wrong.  I am totall uninterested in talking to you now.

Tongue in cheek, of course - a play on Linus' "narrow minded views"
about svn.  Not much of a sense of humor, eh?

You may consider the idea that the next committed state ought to be
available for build/test to be a "narrow-minded" view.  I find it to
be a manifestly sound view.  In fact, if you disagree I have little
respect for your technical judgment and therefore am not concerned if
you will not talk with me.  Which is too bad on both counts.

Thanks,
Bob