Re: [PATCH] Ask for "git program" even against git-daemon

"Shawn O. Pearce" [off-list ref] writes:

Junio C Hamano [off-list ref] wrote:

quoted

"Shawn O. Pearce" [off-list ref] writes:

quoted

But I wonder if this patch is even worth it at some later point
in time.  Are we also going to change git-daemon to stop accepting
"git-" form?  Is it a worthwhile change?

This was merely responding to...

    From: "Shawn O. Pearce" [off-list ref]
    Subject: Re: [PATCH] Keep some git-* programs in $(bindir)
    Date: Wed, 25 Jun 2008 00:37:41 -0400
    Message-ID: [ref]

    Daniel Barkalow [off-list ref] wrote:
    > ...
    > Should they use "git upload-pack" [...]

    IMHO they should in the future use "git upload-pack".

Sorry I wasn't clear. I was talking about the SSH transport only.
For git:// we could just always send git-upload-pack, like your
transitional patch does.  Then we stay compatible with even very
old git:// servers.

Ok, if that is the plan, then we wouldn't even need to futureproof
git-daemon at all.

Not having to change anything is good ;-).