Re: [PATCH 3/3] The "curl" executable is no longer required
From: Johan Herland <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:46
On Sunday 15 June 2008, Jakub Narebski wrote:
"David Symonds" [off-list ref] writes:quoted
On Sun, Jun 15, 2008 at 8:16 PM, Johan Herland [off-list ref]
wrote:
quoted
quoted
diff --git a/git.spec.in b/git.spec.in index 97a26be..d946bb1 100644 --- a/git.spec.in +++ b/git.spec.in@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@ BuildRequires: zlib-devel >= 1.2,openssl-devel, curl-devel, expat-devel, gettex BuildRoot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root-%(%{__id_u} -n) Requires: perl-Git = %{version}-%{release} -Requires: zlib >= 1.2, rsync, curl, less, openssh-clients, expat +Requires: zlib >= 1.2, rsync, less, openssh-clients, expat Provides: git-core = %{version}-%{release} Obsoletes: git-core <= 1.5.4.2 Obsoletes: git-p4Shouldn't libcurl still be listed as a requirement? Or is it statically linked?It is not necessary to enumerate simple library dependencies, as rpmbuild _detects_ those dependencies during building binary RPMS. Only unusual requirements (on programs (tools) or on specific version of library) are needed to be added in Requires header. This has nothing to do with BuildRequires. Besides it worked without libcurl in Requires, so it should continue to work without it, isn't it?
Unfortunately I don't know this format at all. There are now two versions of the patch, one without "Requires: curl", and one where it's replaced by "Requires: libcurl". Someone with more RPM knowledge will have to determine which is right. ...Johan -- Johan Herland, [off-list ref] www.herland.net