Thread (16 messages) flat view 16 messages, 3 authors, 2016-06-15
  • (off-list ancestor, not in this archive)
  • Re: git bugs · Junio C Hamano <hidden> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: git bugs · Ben Lynn <hidden> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: git bugs · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: git bugs · Ben Lynn <hidden> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: git bugs · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: git bugs · Ben Lynn <hidden> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: git bugs · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: git bugs · Ben Lynn <hidden> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: git bugs · Ben Lynn <hidden> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: git bugs · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: git bugs · Ben Lynn <hidden> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: git bugs · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: git bugs · Ben Lynn <hidden> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: git bugs · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: git bugs · Ben Lynn <hidden> · 2016-06-15
  • Re: git bugs · Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org> · 2016-06-15

Re: git bugs

From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:43


On Wed, 11 Jun 2008, Ben Lynn wrote:
The only drawback is that I'm not sure how acceptable it is to write to 
the index on a read operation. Is this a big deal?
Historically, we *never* did it. In fact, it was a big deal. These days we 
do it opportunistically for "git diff" if we can, but making sure that it 
all still works for a read-only access (think gitweb etc - the reader is 
*not* necessarily the owner of the archive at all!)

So I really prefer not to. But you can take it up with Junio if you think 
it can be a big deal.

		Linus
Keyboard shortcuts
hback out one level
jnext message in thread
kprevious message in thread
ldrill in
Escclose help / fold thread tree
?toggle this help