Re: [PATCH - stgit] Patch to allow import of compressed files
From: Clark Williams <hidden>
Date: 2016-06-15 22:44:43
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Karl Hasselström wrote:
On 2008-06-10 08:54:58 -0500, Clark Williams wrote:quoted
--- a/stgit/commands/imprt.py +++ b/stgit/commands/imprt.py@@ -178,8 +178,22 @@ def __create_patch(filename, message, author_name, author_email, def __import_file(filename, options, patch = None): """Import a patch from a file or standard input """ + if patch: + pname = patch + else: + pname = filename + if filename: - f = file(filename) + if filename.endswith('.gz'): + import gzip + f = gzip.open(filename) + pname = strip_suffix('.gz', filename) + elif filename.endswith('.bz2'): + import bz2 + f = bz2.BZ2File(filename) + pname = strip_suffic('.bz2', filename)^ Here's why I keep blathering about tests! In Python, you don't have a compiler to catch these for you ...
Yup, caught that right after I sent the updated patch :)
quoted
+ else: + f = file(filename) else: f = sys.stdin@@ -197,11 +211,6 @@ def __import_file(filename, options, patch = None): if filename: f.close() - if patch: - pname = patch - else: - pname = filename -I just realized a problem with this that was already present in your first version: if patch != None, so that you set pname = patch, you overwrite pname since you strip the .gz/.bz2 suffixes _later_.
Ah, I didn't realize that patchname overrides all (should have). I'll fix that next go-round.
Other than that, it looks good. But you sounded tempted to go with the idea of just trying the decompressors rather than go by the suffix? I think that'd be an improvement.
Yeah, it's tempting. I'll play with it a bit and see what it would take. Seems it would just take a try/except block with logic to make the patchname right (I still would want to remove a .gz/.bz2 suffix from the patchname).
As for testing, you'd simply make two copies of one of the subtests in t1800, where you test .gz- and .bz2-compressed versions of the same patch. Should take about five minutes to write.
I'll make sure I have tests to go with the next patch. Clark -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iEYEARECAAYFAkhQCygACgkQqA4JVb61b9fckgCfbjep1oC3WT3hxVSo/8y6/FVM O8AAn1GEGjvbwerEY0U0N1UlJC8Lv37R =RHjB -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----